| # | User | Rating |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | tourist | 3880 |
| 2 | jiangly | 3669 |
| 3 | ecnerwala | 3654 |
| 4 | Benq | 3627 |
| 5 | orzdevinwang | 3612 |
| 6 | Geothermal | 3569 |
| 6 | cnnfls_csy | 3569 |
| 8 | jqdai0815 | 3532 |
| 9 | Radewoosh | 3522 |
| 10 | gyh20 | 3447 |
| # | User | Contrib. |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | awoo | 161 |
| 1 | maomao90 | 161 |
| 3 | adamant | 156 |
| 4 | maroonrk | 153 |
| 5 | -is-this-fft- | 148 |
| 5 | atcoder_official | 148 |
| 5 | SecondThread | 148 |
| 8 | Petr | 147 |
| 9 | nor | 144 |
| 10 | TheScrasse | 142 |
Breakthrough in AI: Google's AI is almost gold-level at IMO
https://deepmind.google/discover/blog/ai-solves-imo-problems-at-silver-medal-level/
It's a bit scary to think that once it gets good at competitive programming, it could easily reach a 2100+ rating.
I'm curious about how programmers can keep their skills sharp in this AI-augmented world we're moving towards. How do you think we can stay ahead? I'd love to hear your thoughts and opinions on this.
