| # | User | Rating |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | tourist | 3845 |
| 2 | jiangly | 3707 |
| 3 | Benq | 3630 |
| 4 | orzdevinwang | 3573 |
| 5 | Geothermal | 3569 |
| 5 | cnnfls_csy | 3569 |
| 7 | jqdai0815 | 3532 |
| 8 | ecnerwala | 3501 |
| 9 | gyh20 | 3447 |
| 10 | Rebelz | 3409 |
| # | User | Contrib. |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | maomao90 | 171 |
| 2 | adamant | 163 |
| 3 | awoo | 161 |
| 4 | nor | 152 |
| 5 | maroonrk | 151 |
| 5 | -is-this-fft- | 151 |
| 7 | TheScrasse | 148 |
| 8 | atcoder_official | 146 |
| 9 | Petr | 145 |
| 10 | pajenegod | 144 |
(5B) Similar Method but Different Verdict — Runtime Error vs Accepted
When I was trying 5B, I get runtime error at the first time. I was frustrated since it works well in my computer. After observing the output from the judge, I suspected that there may be problem somewhere around the input handling part. So I re-wrote that part.
It is accepted and I have no idea why....
