# | User | Rating |
---|---|---|
1 | ecnerwala | 3649 |
2 | Benq | 3581 |
3 | orzdevinwang | 3570 |
4 | Geothermal | 3569 |
4 | cnnfls_csy | 3569 |
6 | tourist | 3565 |
7 | maroonrk | 3531 |
8 | Radewoosh | 3521 |
9 | Um_nik | 3482 |
10 | jiangly | 3468 |
# | User | Contrib. |
---|---|---|
1 | maomao90 | 174 |
2 | awoo | 164 |
3 | adamant | 161 |
4 | TheScrasse | 159 |
5 | nor | 158 |
6 | maroonrk | 156 |
7 | -is-this-fft- | 152 |
8 | SecondThread | 147 |
9 | orz | 146 |
10 | pajenegod | 145 |
Name |
---|
In fact there are many generalizations of Cayley theorem (though I didn't know that particular one).
One was given as a problem on Putnam competition one year ago: http://www.artofproblemsolving.com/Forum/viewtopic.php?p=3315688&sid=56608f6bc111f1ce8bcfb33ff1220ce3#p3315688
Here is another one I know. Assume that we want to compute number of forests on n vertices with k trees such that vertices with indiced 1, ..., n belong to other trees. Then number of them is equal to knn - k - 1.
Despite the fact that there are many of them I always got problems even with proving basic version :p.