# | User | Rating |
---|---|---|
1 | ecnerwala | 3649 |
2 | Benq | 3581 |
3 | orzdevinwang | 3570 |
4 | Geothermal | 3569 |
4 | cnnfls_csy | 3569 |
6 | tourist | 3565 |
7 | maroonrk | 3531 |
8 | Radewoosh | 3521 |
9 | Um_nik | 3482 |
10 | jiangly | 3468 |
# | User | Contrib. |
---|---|---|
1 | maomao90 | 174 |
2 | awoo | 164 |
3 | adamant | 161 |
4 | TheScrasse | 159 |
5 | nor | 158 |
6 | maroonrk | 156 |
7 | -is-this-fft- | 152 |
8 | SecondThread | 147 |
9 | orz | 146 |
10 | pajenegod | 145 |
Name |
---|
I think u have issues with stack size.
"u have" Is that mean that is my machine problem ? does it work for you ?
Yep, everything works fine on my PC, you should either allocate bigger stack or avoid recursion. (I believe it is not that hard in that task, simply use std::stack or array instead of recursion)
You can also iterate backwards through the dp states before answering. If your dp recurrence goes "forward" ( dp(x) depends on dp values greater than x) fill the values from MAXN to 0. Doing that the program will never reach a recursion depth greater than 1. It is a cheap and fast way to fix this kind of issue.