Hello!
My question is simple. Can someone give me a test sample for maximum matching in bipartite graphs on which Kuhn's algorithm preforms badly (something like O(N * M) in time). Thanks in advance.
→ Обратите внимание
→ Трансляции
→ Лидеры (рейтинг)
| № | Пользователь | Рейтинг |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | tourist | 3690 |
| 2 | jiangly | 3647 |
| 3 | Benq | 3581 |
| 4 | orzdevinwang | 3570 |
| 5 | Geothermal | 3569 |
| 5 | cnnfls_csy | 3569 |
| 7 | Radewoosh | 3509 |
| 8 | ecnerwala | 3486 |
| 9 | jqdai0815 | 3474 |
| 10 | gyh20 | 3447 |
| Страны | Города | Организации | Всё → |
→ Лидеры (вклад)
| № | Пользователь | Вклад |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | maomao90 | 171 |
| 2 | adamant | 164 |
| 3 | awoo | 163 |
| 4 | TheScrasse | 159 |
| 5 | nor | 157 |
| 6 | maroonrk | 155 |
| 7 | -is-this-fft- | 152 |
| 8 | Petr | 147 |
| 9 | orz | 145 |
| 9 | pajenegod | 145 |
→ Найти пользователя
→ Прямой эфир
Codeforces (c) Copyright 2010-2024 Михаил Мирзаянов
Соревнования по программированию 2.0
Время на сервере: 26.05.2024 07:01:44 (i1).
Десктопная версия, переключиться на мобильную.
При поддержке
In a complete bipartite graph, Kuhn's would traverse the longest augmenting path first: http://imgur.com/a/dXXRq
It seems to be 1 + 2 + ... + N = O(N2) in that case
It will take longest time if it fails to augment the matching. Then it will have to look through all edges in adjacency lists of reachable nodes. So we take a full bipartite graph with n/4 + n/4 nodes and another n/2 nodes connect to any node in the right half, m=n^2/16+n/2. Ignoring the part where we find matching in full part the total number of times we will look at some edge is n/2 (m-n/2+1) = O(nm)