| № | Пользователь | Рейтинг |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | tourist | 3690 |
| 2 | jiangly | 3647 |
| 3 | Benq | 3581 |
| 4 | orzdevinwang | 3570 |
| 5 | Geothermal | 3569 |
| 5 | cnnfls_csy | 3569 |
| 7 | Radewoosh | 3509 |
| 8 | ecnerwala | 3486 |
| 9 | jqdai0815 | 3474 |
| 10 | gyh20 | 3447 |
| Страны | Города | Организации | Всё → |
| № | Пользователь | Вклад |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | maomao90 | 174 |
| 2 | awoo | 165 |
| 3 | adamant | 161 |
| 4 | TheScrasse | 160 |
| 5 | nor | 158 |
| 6 | maroonrk | 156 |
| 7 | -is-this-fft- | 152 |
| 8 | orz | 146 |
| 9 | pajenegod | 145 |
| 9 | SecondThread | 145 |
Hi Codeforces,
In problem "Kefa and Dishes" (580D div 2), statements said that: "It is guaranteed that there are no such pairs of indexes i and j (1 ≤ i < j ≤ k), that xi = xj and yi = yj."
But in the 5th test case:
7 4 3 2 6 13 5 7 1 9 6 1 15 2 5 3 6 4 8
It's easy to see that x1 = x3. Was this test case invalid?
I think it's not a contradiction. Although it is x1 = x3, it doesn't mean "xi = xj and yi = yj" if y1 is not equal to y3. It means it should be (xi, yi) ≠ (xj, yj). It's just a coincidence but in yesterday's ACM-ICPC style contest I did exactly this type of misreading and I got 8 Wrong Answers.