| № | Пользователь | Рейтинг |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | tourist | 3690 |
| 2 | jiangly | 3647 |
| 3 | Benq | 3581 |
| 4 | orzdevinwang | 3570 |
| 5 | Geothermal | 3569 |
| 5 | cnnfls_csy | 3569 |
| 7 | Radewoosh | 3509 |
| 8 | ecnerwala | 3486 |
| 9 | jqdai0815 | 3474 |
| 10 | gyh20 | 3447 |
| Страны | Города | Организации | Всё → |
| № | Пользователь | Вклад |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | maomao90 | 174 |
| 2 | awoo | 164 |
| 3 | adamant | 162 |
| 4 | TheScrasse | 160 |
| 5 | nor | 158 |
| 6 | maroonrk | 156 |
| 7 | -is-this-fft- | 152 |
| 8 | orz | 146 |
| 9 | pajenegod | 145 |
| 9 | SecondThread | 145 |
I was trying to solve this problem. With this code I got several WA & wasted hours of time by debugging it. But I've changed to this got AC! With no change of idea. All I changed was a line of code O_o.
it = lower_bound( v.begin() , v.end() , com [ i ].size() );
to
a = com [ i ].size();
it = lower_bound( v.begin() , v.end() , a );
Is there any problem with that?
Thank You.
You also changed: v.erase( v.begin() , v.begin()+(it — v.begin() +1) ); to: *it = -1; sort( v.begin() , v.end() );
this is the exact code as the accepted code, I just changed the described change, it's giving WA.
look at this
simply use : it = lower_bound( v.begin() , v.end() , int(com [ i ].size()) ); lower_bound is a template function it detects type(T) by last parameter.
vector.size returning size_t (Unsigned int) so you have lower_bound for size_t values vs int values.
Wow, what a shot!
I didn't know that it returns Unsigned int. Thank you.