| # | User | Rating |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | tourist | 3690 |
| 2 | jiangly | 3647 |
| 3 | Benq | 3581 |
| 4 | orzdevinwang | 3570 |
| 5 | Geothermal | 3569 |
| 5 | cnnfls_csy | 3569 |
| 7 | Radewoosh | 3509 |
| 8 | ecnerwala | 3486 |
| 9 | jqdai0815 | 3474 |
| 10 | gyh20 | 3447 |
| # | User | Contrib. |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | maomao90 | 174 |
| 2 | awoo | 165 |
| 3 | adamant | 161 |
| 4 | TheScrasse | 160 |
| 5 | nor | 158 |
| 6 | maroonrk | 156 |
| 7 | -is-this-fft- | 152 |
| 8 | orz | 146 |
| 9 | pajenegod | 145 |
| 9 | SecondThread | 145 |
how to prove that a dp solution state is wrong in general?
I'm stuck in this problem 225C - Barcode
Here is my solution 33821210
I tried to calculate the array dp[current_column][width_of_current_group][hash_or_dot], and after i read the tutorial saying that i should calculate only dp[current_column][hash_or_dot] i didn't figure out why my solution was wrong.
I think they are the same, can't see any difference... can somebody help?
| Rev. | Lang. | By | When | Δ | Comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| en2 |
|
WinstonWolf | 2017-12-31 02:33:07 | 8 | Tiny change: 'ission:33807563]\n\nI tri' -> 'ission:33821210]\n\nI tri' | |
| en1 |
|
WinstonWolf | 2017-12-31 02:31:45 | 461 | Initial revision (published) |
