| № | Пользователь | Рейтинг |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | tourist | 3690 |
| 2 | jiangly | 3647 |
| 3 | Benq | 3581 |
| 4 | orzdevinwang | 3570 |
| 5 | Geothermal | 3569 |
| 5 | cnnfls_csy | 3569 |
| 7 | Radewoosh | 3509 |
| 8 | ecnerwala | 3486 |
| 9 | jqdai0815 | 3474 |
| 10 | gyh20 | 3447 |
| Страны | Города | Организации | Всё → |
| № | Пользователь | Вклад |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | maomao90 | 174 |
| 2 | awoo | 164 |
| 3 | adamant | 163 |
| 4 | TheScrasse | 159 |
| 5 | nor | 157 |
| 6 | maroonrk | 156 |
| 7 | -is-this-fft- | 152 |
| 8 | Petr | 146 |
| 8 | orz | 146 |
| 10 | BledDest | 145 |
About GNU C++17(64)
Hi everyone! Hope you guys a nice weekend!
Recently, I have tried to submit my solutions in both GNU C++17 and GNU C++17(64). The result is predictable, GNU C++17(64) is faster compared to GNU C++17. My question is: Is it safe to use C++17(64) in the real contest? I know that C++17(64) was just added a few months ago. So I don't know whether it may lead to some undefined behavior bugs or something like that...
Thanks for reading!
| Rev. | Язык | Кто | Когда | Δ | Комментарий | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| en2 |
|
the_midnight_sun | 2020-05-23 19:56:28 | 17 | ||
| en1 |
|
the_midnight_sun | 2020-05-23 19:54:44 | 451 | Initial revision (published) |
