| № | Пользователь | Рейтинг |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | tourist | 3690 |
| 2 | jiangly | 3647 |
| 3 | Benq | 3581 |
| 4 | orzdevinwang | 3570 |
| 5 | Geothermal | 3569 |
| 5 | cnnfls_csy | 3569 |
| 7 | Radewoosh | 3509 |
| 8 | ecnerwala | 3486 |
| 9 | jqdai0815 | 3474 |
| 10 | gyh20 | 3447 |
| Страны | Города | Организации | Всё → |
| № | Пользователь | Вклад |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | maomao90 | 174 |
| 2 | awoo | 164 |
| 3 | adamant | 163 |
| 4 | TheScrasse | 159 |
| 5 | nor | 157 |
| 6 | maroonrk | 156 |
| 7 | -is-this-fft- | 152 |
| 8 | Petr | 146 |
| 8 | orz | 146 |
| 10 | pajenegod | 145 |
hi :)
is it possible make all this operations with BIT?
1- add(l, r, val) >add a[l..r] value of val
2- sum(l, r) >calculate sum of a[l..r]
I thought it is impossible until saw this comment
I didn't understand it correctly :( can anybody explain the approach:)
Tks a lot
Yes. http://petr-mitrichev.blogspot.ru/2013/05/fenwick-tree-range-updates.html
Yep, as adamant has posted it is possible. However in my opinion its much better to just be comfortable using a segment tree, after a bit of practice they really aren't complicated and don't take very long to write.