# | User | Rating |
---|---|---|
1 | tourist | 3845 |
2 | jiangly | 3707 |
3 | Benq | 3630 |
4 | orzdevinwang | 3573 |
5 | Geothermal | 3569 |
5 | cnnfls_csy | 3569 |
7 | jqdai0815 | 3532 |
8 | ecnerwala | 3501 |
9 | gyh20 | 3447 |
10 | Rebelz | 3409 |
# | User | Contrib. |
---|---|---|
1 | maomao90 | 168 |
2 | awoo | 163 |
3 | adamant | 162 |
4 | maroonrk | 152 |
5 | nor | 151 |
5 | -is-this-fft- | 151 |
7 | atcoder_official | 147 |
7 | TheScrasse | 147 |
9 | Petr | 145 |
10 | pajenegod | 144 |
Name |
---|
Yes, the same thing was happened in my case.
But, you should have optimized the code, as you are taking input 3 x 10^6 numbers!
Your code gets AC without fastio: 267774400 (pikachu shocked emote)
Using scanf and printf is again an optimisation that does not compliment testing the logic of the code
I do not think you have a right idea of what optimization is.
Your argument can be disproved by the fact that most competitive programmers use C++. For other languages, sometimes TL is scaled higher. Using C++ instead of Java is not an optimization.
Inputs are larger precisely to check the logic and to not let codes with worse time complexity pass.