Same code got TLE in GNU C++11 and got AC in GNU C++17. Can someone please tell me the reason behind it?
TLE (C++11): http://codeforces.com/contest/1520/submission/115347126
AC (C++17): http://codeforces.com/contest/1520/submission/115347176
Thanks!
№ | Пользователь | Рейтинг |
---|---|---|
1 | tourist | 3880 |
2 | jiangly | 3669 |
3 | ecnerwala | 3654 |
4 | Benq | 3627 |
5 | orzdevinwang | 3612 |
6 | Geothermal | 3569 |
6 | cnnfls_csy | 3569 |
8 | jqdai0815 | 3532 |
9 | Radewoosh | 3522 |
10 | gyh20 | 3447 |
Страны | Города | Организации | Всё → |
№ | Пользователь | Вклад |
---|---|---|
1 | awoo | 161 |
2 | maomao90 | 160 |
3 | adamant | 156 |
4 | maroonrk | 153 |
5 | -is-this-fft- | 148 |
5 | SecondThread | 148 |
5 | atcoder_official | 148 |
8 | Petr | 147 |
9 | nor | 144 |
9 | TheScrasse | 144 |
Same code got TLE in GNU C++11 and got AC in GNU C++17. Can someone please tell me the reason behind it?
TLE (C++11): http://codeforces.com/contest/1520/submission/115347126
AC (C++17): http://codeforces.com/contest/1520/submission/115347176
Thanks!
Название |
---|
Running the same code in custom invocation and printing
v.size()
gives81
in C++17 and9090927
in C++11, so you're iterating over significantly more values when submitting under C++11 per test case. As for why, there appears to be a difference in the implementation ofpow
, ask
takes on the values1, 11, 111
in C++17 and1, 11, 110
in C++11. Not sure why that happens though, I think the actual implementation ofpow
is architecture dependent. In my opinion, it's easier to just not involve floating point computation if possible.