To clarify, "subarray" is defined like, for example: if A="abc" B="??a???b????c???" then A is subarray of B.
# | User | Rating |
---|---|---|
1 | tourist | 3880 |
2 | jiangly | 3669 |
3 | ecnerwala | 3654 |
4 | Benq | 3627 |
5 | orzdevinwang | 3612 |
6 | Geothermal | 3569 |
6 | cnnfls_csy | 3569 |
8 | jqdai0815 | 3532 |
9 | Radewoosh | 3522 |
10 | gyh20 | 3447 |
# | User | Contrib. |
---|---|---|
1 | awoo | 161 |
2 | maomao90 | 160 |
3 | adamant | 156 |
4 | maroonrk | 153 |
5 | -is-this-fft- | 148 |
5 | SecondThread | 148 |
5 | atcoder_official | 148 |
8 | Petr | 147 |
9 | nor | 144 |
9 | TheScrasse | 144 |
why I can't find subarray correctly?
To clarify, "subarray" is defined like, for example: if A="abc" B="??a???b????c???" then A is subarray of B.
Rev. | Lang. | By | When | Δ | Comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
en5 |
![]() |
DNNJFM | 2016-07-31 19:30:36 | 2 | Tiny change: '&& B[curB]==c ) curB+' -> '&& B[curB]!=c ) curB+' (published) | |
en4 |
![]() |
DNNJFM | 2016-07-31 19:25:51 | 14 | Tiny change: 'of B, but I get AC, II get WA:' -> 'of B, but versionI get AC, versionII get WA:' (saved to drafts) | |
en3 |
![]() |
DNNJFM | 2016-07-31 19:24:47 | 537 | Tiny change: ' string.\n~~~~~\nc' - (published) | |
en2 |
![]() |
DNNJFM | 2016-07-31 19:15:22 | 201 | ||
en1 |
![]() |
DNNJFM | 2016-07-31 19:14:05 | 149 | Initial revision (saved to drafts) |
Name |
---|