Hi everyone! After a relatively long lull, I decided that ~~my contribution growing too slowly~~ the hour has come to please you with another article in the blog *:)*

2 months ago user Perlik wrote an article, in which he described a very interesting STL implemented data structure that allows you to quickly perform various operations with substrings. Some time after I tested it on various tasks and, unfortunately, tend to get a negative result — rope was too slow, especially when it came to working with individual elements.

For some time, I forgot about that article. Increasingly, however, I was faced with problems in which it was necessary to implement set with the ability to know ordinal number of item and also to get item by its ordinal number (ie, order statistic in the set). And then I remembered that in the comments to that article, someone mentioned about the mysterious data structure order statistics tree, which supports these two operations and which is implemented in STL (unfortunately only for the GNU C++). And here begins my fascinating acquaintance with policy based data structures, and I want to tell you about them *:)*

Let's get started. In this article I will talk about IMO the most interesting of the implemented structures — tree. We need to include the following headers:

```
#include <ext/pb_ds/assoc_container.hpp> // Common file
#include <ext/pb_ds/tree_policy.hpp> // Including tree_order_statistics_node_update
```

After closer inspection you may find that the last two files contained in the library

```
#include <ext/pb_ds/detail/standard_policies.hpp>
```

Namespace, which we will have to work in newer versions of C++ is called `__gnu_pbds;`

, earlier it was called `pb_ds;`

Now let's look at the concrete structure.

The tree-based container has the following declaration:

```
template<
typename Key, // Key type
typename Mapped, // Mapped-policy
typename Cmp_Fn = std::less<Key>, // Key comparison functor
typename Tag = rb_tree_tag, // Specifies which underlying data structure to use
template<
typename Const_Node_Iterator,
typename Node_Iterator,
typename Cmp_Fn_,
typename Allocator_>
class Node_Update = null_node_update, // A policy for updating node invariants
typename Allocator = std::allocator<char> > // An allocator type
class tree;
```

Experienced participants may have already noticed that if initialize the template only the first two types, we obtain almost exact copy of the container `map`

. Just say, that this container can be `set`

, for this you just need to specify the second argument template type as `null_type`

( in older versions it is `null_mapped_type`

).

By the way `Tag`

and `Node_Update`

are missing in `map`

. Let us examine them in more detail.

`Tag`

— class denoting a tree structure, which we will use. There are three base-classes provided in STL for this, it is `rb_tree_tag`

(red-black tree), `splay_tree_tag`

(splay tree) and `ov_tree_tag`

(ordered-vector tree). Sadly, at competitions we can use only red-black trees for this because splay tree and OV-tree using linear-timed split operation that prevents us to use them.

`Node_Update`

— class denoting policy for updating node invariants. By default it is set to `null_node_update`

, ie, additional information not stored in the vertices. In addition, C++ implemented an update policy `tree_order_statistics_node_update`

, which, in fact, carries the necessary operations. Consider them. Most likely, the best way to set the tree is as follows:

```
typedef tree<
int,
null_type,
less<int>,
rb_tree_tag,
tree_order_statistics_node_update>
ordered_set;
```

If we want to get map but not the set, as the second argument type must be used mapped type. Apparently, the tree supports the same operations as the `set`

(at least I haven't any problems with them before), but also there are two new features — it is `find_by_order()`

and `order_of_key()`

. The first returns an iterator to the k-th largest element (counting from zero), the second — the number of items in a set that are strictly smaller than our item. Example of use:

ordered_set X;
X.insert(1);
X.insert(2);
X.insert(4);
X.insert(8);
X.insert(16);
cout<<*X.find_by_order(1)<<endl; // 2
cout<<*X.find_by_order(2)<<endl; // 4
cout<<*X.find_by_order(4)<<endl; // 16
cout<<(end(X)==X.find_by_order(6))<<endl; // true
cout<<X.order_of_key(-5)<<endl; // 0
cout<<X.order_of_key(1)<<endl; // 0
cout<<X.order_of_key(3)<<endl; // 2
cout<<X.order_of_key(4)<<endl; // 2
cout<<X.order_of_key(400)<<endl; // 5

Finally I would like to say about the performance of order_statistics_tree in STL. For this, I provide the following table.

Solution\Problem | 1028 | 1090 | 1521 | 1439 |

order_statistics_tree, STL | 0.062 | 0.218 | 0.296 | 0.468 |

Segment tree | 0.031 | 0.078 | 0.171 | 0.078 0.859* |

Binary Indexed Tree | 0.031 | 0.062 | 0.062 | |

* The final task requires direct access to the nodes of the tree for the implementation of solutions for O (mlogn). Without it, the solution works in O (mlogn*logn).

As you can see from all this , order_statistics_tree relatively little behind handwritten structures, and at times ahead of them in execution time. At the same time the code size is reduced considerably. Hence we can conclude is that order_statistics_tree — it is good and it can be used in contests.

Besides tree, I also wanted to describe here trie. However , I was confused by some aspects of its implementation, greatly limiting its usefulness in programming olympiads, so I decided not to talk about it. If anyone want he is encouraged to try to learn more about this structure by himself.

Useful links:

— Documentation of pb_ds

— Testing of pb_ds

— Using of pb_ds

— Demonstration of order_statistics_tree

— Demonstration of trie with prefix search

— Operations with intervals with handwritten update policy class

— More examples from that site

P.S. Sorry for my poor English *:)*

Example of trie with search of prefix range.

Problem: 1414

Solution: http://ideone.com/6VFNZl

Возможно, вам покажутся слегка нетривиальными решения деревом отрезков и деревом Фенвика, особенно, задач 1521 и 1439. Скорее всего, позже я также предоставлю статью, в которой опишу некоторые интересные способы использования этих структур, которые редко встречаются.

======================================================================================= You may be wondered about how I use segment tree and binary indexed tree in my solutions, especially for problems 1521 and 1439. Most likely, later I'll provide an entry about some interesting ways of using this structures, which are quite rare.

Here it is :)

This is really useful. Thanks a lot!

Very useful article! I need order-statistics on a multiset. How should I define the tree as?

As I know, there is no implemented tree multiset in STL. However you can use pair<T,int> as a key where the second element in pair is the time when item has been added.

Apparently, you can. Once I tried to write less_equal instead of less and it started to work as multiset, I even got AC using it in region olympiad)

I can't erase elements with less_equal comparator, e.g. this code output "1"

codeSo I guess it's not very useful thing (or I do something wrong).

UPD: I can delete iterator which I got with lower_bound. But it works incorrectly. This code erase 1, not 0

CodeWow. then it really sucks. Seems like I only used it with insert operations and strangely enough it worked)

Well, actually it works fine and exactly does what you want! The issue is that you're passing

`less_equal<int>`

as the tree comparator. Therefore it uses the same function for`lower_bound()`

. By definition of lower_bound function (according to cplusplus.com) it finds the first element not compared`true`

. Thus returns the first element greater than`val`

which is`1`

in your example.In order to make sure you may even test

`set<int,less_equal<int> >`

which results the same..(same comment as above)

what will be the complexity of erase operation? O(logn) or O(n)

O(logn)

Really??

Yes.

Is there any efficient function to merge 2 trees ?

You can do in log(n) if the greatest element of 1 tree is smaller than smallest of other. Otherwise, I don't you have a better option. Tell me as well if you have found something interesting.

Surely worth looking into :) Thanks

how can i use it like multiset ?

Main idea is to keep pairs like {

elem,id}.thanks a lot :)

How will find_by_order be used in this case?

like me.order_of_key({x, 0}) me.find_by_order({x,0}) dose not work.. why??

*me.find_by_order({x,0})

still it does not work.

wtf, find_by_order takes number

Hi, adamant, the code files in Useful Links don't seem to work. Could you fix them?

Thanks for this great post. I am looking forward to your next and next next posts.

Can you elaborate please?

For example, the code in "Demonstration of trie with prefix search" cannot run on my computer. I saw that there was some old syntax like the namespace pb_ds. I changed it, then it returned a new error in another place. The truth is I am not good enough to change things any more. I hope that you can update it. (I know that I can use the trie code in one of your comments, but this post would be even better if the cost in Useful Links were also updated)

Thank you.

I can't edit the original files — they're not mine. But here is the correct version: http://ideone.com/BpZlYO

Thank you.

https://www.e-olymp.com/ru/problems/2961 Is it possible to solve this problem using this algorithm?

Can anybody share a Java equivalent class for this type of set or a code which acts according to above data structure?

It does not exist.

You may use instead:

I thought of number compression + fenwick tree, but this solution will work for only offline queries. I want to handle online queries. The best I can think of now is Treap + Segment Tree or Treap + Fenwick Tree. But here again is the problem of implementation of mixed data structure, I am unable to think how to implement that. Can you please help me?

Any idea on how to use this pre C++11?

How can I use a custom compare function in the "Key comparison functor" section for custom data types?

Just like for regular set..

I can use custom compare function for a set by using operator overloading. I want to know is there any other way to do this for both set and ordered set using lambda expression or just using a compare bool function?

Thank adamant you very much for your nice post.

I suppose you can overload operator and still use

`less<T>`

. Also you can use functors and lambdas in the way similar as for sets:How To Solve This Problems. Plz Help Me.

Is it possible to search for the order of a non-key value by passing a comparator/function ? I sometimes find myself have to use my own tree templates instead because of having to write a search function that can cope with this task.

What is the constant factor of order_statistics_tree though it executes in logarithmic complexity ? I think it's constant factor is very high.

could anyone write the exact thing to use this data structure as map..pls.I'm not able do so.

And what exactly do you want from it? You can use something like that.

as it was mentioned in the article that we can use it as map by defining mapped type .So I tried to do that by couldn't. that's all;)

is this thing a order statistics tree

can we use it as multiset?