Could anyone please explain the logic behind this problem.
problem link: Three Families
№ | Пользователь | Рейтинг |
---|---|---|
1 | tourist | 3690 |
2 | jiangly | 3647 |
3 | Benq | 3581 |
4 | orzdevinwang | 3570 |
5 | Geothermal | 3569 |
5 | cnnfls_csy | 3569 |
7 | Radewoosh | 3509 |
8 | ecnerwala | 3486 |
9 | jqdai0815 | 3474 |
10 | gyh20 | 3447 |
Страны | Города | Организации | Всё → |
№ | Пользователь | Вклад |
---|---|---|
1 | maomao90 | 174 |
2 | awoo | 165 |
3 | adamant | 161 |
4 | TheScrasse | 160 |
5 | nor | 158 |
6 | maroonrk | 156 |
7 | -is-this-fft- | 152 |
8 | orz | 146 |
9 | SecondThread | 145 |
9 | pajenegod | 145 |
Could anyone please explain the logic behind this problem.
problem link: Three Families
Название |
---|
ans=(c*(a+a-b))/(a+b);
could you please xplain ,how did u get that expression
Family C would only pay families A and B for doing the portion of work that was the responsibility of family C not for what their(A and B) individual responsibilities were. that is,for sample case total 9 hours of work had to be done (each family had to do 3 hours apiece).Now both A and B not only did their share of 3 hours but family A completed 2 hours of C's work and family B did 1 hour of C's work hence the ratio is 2:1. - Similarly for next sample B just did its assigned work while A did its assigned work and all the work assigned to C and hence get the full amount.