Can someone explain or prove, why calculating all possible values for every interval doesn't get TLE?
I think it should be $$$O(n!)$$$.
# | User | Rating |
---|---|---|
1 | tourist | 3690 |
2 | jiangly | 3647 |
3 | Benq | 3581 |
4 | orzdevinwang | 3570 |
5 | Geothermal | 3569 |
5 | cnnfls_csy | 3569 |
7 | Radewoosh | 3509 |
8 | ecnerwala | 3486 |
9 | jqdai0815 | 3474 |
10 | gyh20 | 3447 |
# | User | Contrib. |
---|---|---|
1 | maomao90 | 174 |
2 | awoo | 165 |
3 | adamant | 161 |
4 | TheScrasse | 160 |
5 | nor | 158 |
6 | maroonrk | 156 |
7 | -is-this-fft- | 152 |
8 | orz | 146 |
9 | SecondThread | 145 |
9 | pajenegod | 145 |
Can someone explain or prove, why calculating all possible values for every interval doesn't get TLE?
I think it should be $$$O(n!)$$$.
Name |
---|
There were atmost 10 operators
Ur complexity isn't $$$O(N!)$$$. Infact if u observe the pattern a bit, you'd find that it's complexity never gets multiplied by factor greater than 4 on increasing N by 1. It's pretty much less than $$$O(4^N)$$$ as well, and it's found out to be roughly O(Catalan Number). For more details, u should check the last part of it's official editorial. Ur solution is the DP solution.