We will hold AtCoder Beginner Contest 169.

- Contest URL: https://atcoder.jp/contests/abc169
- Start Time: http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?iso=20200531T2100&p1=248
- Duration: 100 minutes
- Number of Tasks: 6
- Writer: kyopro_friends, latte0119, tempura0224, ynymxiaolongbao, yuma000
- Rated range: ~ 1999

The point values will be 100-200-300-400-500-600.

We are looking forward to your participation!

Editorial in english must also be posted as soon as in japanese.

Will it make any difference for you ??

I'll post my solutions after the round ends.

where will You post It ?

As a CF Blog.

Atcoder should pay you for this...

In

F, i take input of the interval as pairs and sorted the vector of pairs ,then find the median of that interval. Then do the necessary arithmetic as pointed out by Geothermal in here. This approrach fails in few test cases. What's wrong with my approach with F? Can anyone point out what am i missing? Link of my submissionI believe that for the $$$n$$$ even case, you select the wrong two indices to form the median. Use $$$\frac{n-1}{2}$$$ and $$$\frac{n}{2}$$$, rather than $$$\frac{n}{2}$$$ and $$$\frac{n+1}{2}.$$$

Your suggesstion did help to pass some test cases which were not passing earlier, but still few test cases are failing. Can't think of counter test case which could Hack my code.submission

You don't need to sort vector of pairs. Simply sort individually.

I know from the editorial but the problem is that I don't understand why my solution is wrong?

Your solution is wrong because you have sorted vector of pairs. Let these be pairs. 1 5 2 3 After sorting either they will remain same or 2 3 1 5 There is no possible way answer will be wrong in both the cases because for finding median array needs to be sorted.

Thanks, finally i contructed a test case where my code fails.

Test CaseCorrect Output=5 My Output=7

I hope it would be a great Contest

Excited that I will learn something new!

Update: Learned when to use double when not to use doubles and how to use doubles!

2nd and the 3rd question seems easy but is really tricky... i dont know on which cases my code is getting wa...can anyone please help

its cheating bro!

same problem lol

I think I will be feeling pretty silly after seeing the editorial of b and d.

Don't ruin the name of India more than already it is.

You don't need to look into name of india.

I'm so sad, it took me less time to D than it took me to do B and I haven't even done C. Everytime, I miss one of B-D. I'm cursed D:

I am missing something in B and getting WA again and again. Any hints please!

I'd love to help but I think that is not allowed (correct me if I'm wrong, I'm new to CP), will definitely help after the contest ends.

Yes please man now

so you have to realize anytime the answer overflows out of limit(of data type) or become > 10^18. also if there is even 1 0, ans = 0. Code:

## include <bits/stdc++.h>

using namespace std;

typedef long long ll; typedef unsigned long long ull; typedef unsigned int uint; typedef long double ld;

int main() { ios_base::sync_with_stdio(false); cin.tie(0);

}

I forgot <0 :(

I had the same code, only difference was that i used long long for 'ans' instead of long double and i got WA on one of the test cases .Changed to long double and got AC.Why?

Because long long data type could be overflowing from the multiplication of say 10^12 and 10^12.

I didn't get why should we create separate case for t==0 isn't it taken care while doing ans*=t ?

same here bro..

maybe create a function?

same here bro :(

I solved problem C, and I don't even understand why it works.

i cry

w a n n a d i e.

Will a CE submission be calculated into the overall penalty?

I submitted two pieces of codes in the wrong language and will my overall penalty increase by 10 min?

you can see it in standings in red next to your solutions.

No.

How to solve F?

For F, we can notice that ans is simply summation of i from 1 to n of (number of subsets of length i with sum s) * (2 ^ (n — i)).

So now let dp[x][j] = summation of i from to n of (number of subsets of length n with sum x) * (2 ^ (n — i)) for the prefix 1..j

Now, apply normal knapsack to combine answers, but since you're adding length 1 to your previous sums, we will have to divide them 2

dp[x][j] = dp[x][j — 1] + (dp[x — a[j]][j — 1] * modinv(2))

Answer is dp[s][n]

You can even do it in O(n) space without needing the second dimension, like a normal knapsack, moving backward.

Can you please provide the link for your solution madhav_1999

https://atcoder.jp/contests/abc169/submissions/13869671

Thanks you BTW you are my friend now.

:)

Knapsack for All Segments vs Knapsack for All Subsets :D

How to solve E!

If n is odd, get the maximum median (sort array of B's and get its median) and the minimum median (sort array of A's and get it's median). The answer is max median — min median +1.

If n is even, sort the arrays and do: max median = B[n/2] + B[(n/2)-1], min median = A[n/2] + A[(n/2)-1]. This way we avoid working with not integer numbers. So the answer is still max median — min median +1.

Oh god I was trying to use sweep type algorithm and check for each end point, but your answer is much much easier. Could not implement my approach but will try to refine it

Thanks for your approach but can you prove it!

I am not able to understand why every value between min and max can be attained? Can you explain plz.

From the minimum median, you just need to icrease the median by 1 to go to the next value (in case of n pair, increase first the biggest one and after the smaller one in the middle). You can do this until reach the maximum median.

Could you please give the proof of this approach?

Thanks to 1358C, idea is very similar. You can observe minimum median will be

`median of array x`

and maximum medium will be`median of array y`

.So values in the range

`median of array x`

to`median of array y`

will be covered. Take care when size of array is even.Submission

In the second part, there are essentially two tricks for the problem 1) Sort the array. If the value at index i is 0, then we cannot return -1(no matter what). 2) Multiplying two extremely large numbers even when the data type is long long int will result in negative values, which will result in wrong answers. So, a*b>=c is equivalent to b>=(c/a)(take care of the border cases) Link to my code https://atcoder.jp/contests/abc169/submissions/13810433

https://atcoder.jp/contests/abc169/submissions/13836888

I had an error for just one test case? Can you tell me why?

Okay, so in the 3rd question, I simply multiplied a and b, and applied the floor function for the product. Link to my code in C++ https://atcoder.jp/contests/abc169/submissions/13814577

Submitting the same code, giving WA

I just wonder how to solve B,C...

Is there anything wrong??? https://atcoder.jp/contests/abc169/submissions/13881928 https://atcoder.jp/contests/abc169/submissions/13872116

In problem C, there can be floating-point error.

But how to avoid??

I used string for storing $$$B$$$. Then calculated $$$100*B$$$. link

thank you!

Use b=b*100+0.01;

instead of b*=100;

thank you!

How will there be a floating point error? And how will b=b*100+0.01 save from it?

Yes, I also need to know the same.

I cannot understand why is a floating-point error occurring for input: 999990000000001 9.99 in this submission? Here, the result will not cross 10^18. I don't know that this is a reason or not. Can you please tell me why such kind of error occurs with floating-point values?

In your solution for problem B, if resu is 10^17 and next number is 99 then it might overflow

Thank you !

This is sarcasm..Right???

NO NO NO!! I really don't solve them!

You had a bad day don't worry

. So sad :{

For B, just check 0 case. Then before multiplying with a[i], check if 1e18/a[i] < cur_product. If it is, simply print -1. Otherwise you can safely multiply.

https://atcoder.jp/contests/abc169/submissions/13804989 I did the same... But getting WA in 2 TCs..

Typecast your 1e18 into int before dividing to avoid precision loss.

Changing to ans > (int)(1e18)/i should give you AC

Thank you !

i was getting TLE Second Question

I'm guessing you may have tried to multiply all the numbers together in Python or a similar language? Since the intermediate products can have $$$O(N)$$$ digits, multiplying them takes $$$O(N)$$$ time, so this approach takes $$$O(N^2)$$$ time in the worst case.

Can you tell what's wrong here and why typecasting solution is not accepted in C++?

use long double b;

This will be WA because of precision error. Instead do (a*(b*100))/100 While calculating b*100, make sure you take round(b*100), otherwise things like 23.999999(due to double's precision) will be floored down to 23.

My solutions to all problems are at https://codeforces.com/blog/entry/78195.

This is the solution of the second question.

void solve() { cin>>n; vectorv(n); for(ll i=0;i<n;i++)cin>>v[i]; sort(v.begin(),v.end()); ll p=1,f=0; for(ll i=0;i<n;i++){ if(v[i]>=1000000000 and p>100000000){p=1000000000000000001;break;} if(v[i]>1000000000 and p>=1000000000){p=1000000000000000001;break;}

}

My code is giving WA on one case. Can you tell me why ?

Can someone please tell why this fails for C?

You need to round it, rather than taking its floor. For example

`float('2.51') = 2.509999999...`

, so`int(float('2.51')*100) = 250`

.thank you sir

In C, why is math.trunc(a*b) in python giving WA,but in CPP, this is accepted-

nvm, got it

can anybody find mistake in my D solution.

You are not looking for primes greater than √x.

Try for 4000000028.

Any care to explain why is this wrong for problem C ?

It gives WA for random_12.txt

Edit : I always define int as long long in my template.

I'd guess the issue is double precision. Precision is an issue in general, but in particular, the answer here can be up to $$$10^{16}$$$, which is too large for the number of precision bits in a double.

But here multiplications are in long long, the only place where precision could affect is assigning "b = c*100".

Ah, right; my bad--I misread the solution. The issue is precision in that conversion: I changed b = (c*100) to b = (c*100+0.5) and the solution was accepted.

Thanks for the solution.

Any advice on how to avoid these errors in future ?

You need to understand why this error happened. The reason is that if you read a number as a double (lets say 10) the double can be represented as 9.9999... or maybe 10.000...01 (both of which are 10 indeed woth a very small error intrinsic to the floating point representation)) but in c++ if you convert them to an integer it truncates the value automaticaly, so the result could be either 9 or 10. The solution would be doing the comversion as x_int = round(x_double) or x_int = x_double + 0.5.

Thank you very much. This is what I was looking for.

Being skeptic, if x_double is 4.50 is there any chance I will get 5 instead 4 using your suggested solution ?

Yes, it would be a problem. But you did not quite get how to use what I said. If a number has at most x decimal digits, you may want to multiply it to 10^x and convert to integer, so you do int_x = 10^x*double_x+0.5 (but if double_x has more the x digits this may not work correctly)

Now I got it. Thanks for the help.

but why is this a problem as it is already given in the question that the B is a number with two digits after the decimal point,hence it is always fixed that we are not losing any value for the above solution after multiplying by 100. So why is this so???

deeper explaination Essentially, there's some natural imprecision in the way decimal datatypes are stored in C++ (and in most other languages). C++ stores decimals, like all numbers, in binary, rather than base 10, and in binary, numbers like 0.1, 1.6, and 3.4 are actually repeating decimals. Because of that, when C++ tries to store that kind of number, it will actually store a value that's very close, but slightly higher or slightly lower.

The problem here, though, is that if you get a value slightly lower than, say, 1.01, then when you multiply it by 100, the result will be slightly lower than 101, and will thus get rounded down to 100, giving you an incorrect answer. To deal with this, we add some value (I used 0.5, but it could be much smaller and still work) to ensure that our result will be larger than 101, rather than smaller. i mean to say in easy words there is no like 3.33 that is actually 3.3333333.....so this is making the answer change .Do comment for any queries the above explanation shows why round function works and floor or ciel function don't credits Geothermal

credits Geothermal

Do not assume double arithmetic is correct. Often it is not, the result is only near to the mathematic correct result.

Deal with that or use integers.

I didn't, that's why I converted double to int and then calculated the result.

I am yet to find any solution which always works for doubles.

I disagree with that. You just need to unserstand how big the error can be in the worst case, often the error is smaller than 1, so you can often get the integer part right for sure if the constraints allow that

That is the strategy I would call "deal with it".

Use

`long double`

instead of`double`

Why does long double over double changes anything ? considering value of is B < 10, having 2 digits are decimal point.

I used this formula:

`answer = floor( a * long double(b) )`

Yes, that works well. I used the similar thing to get AC later. Thanks for the answer.

Range of input is too big which will have precision loss. Try using long long and long double

Why does long double over double changes anything ? considering value of is B < 10, having 2 digits are decimal point.

What is the approach for problem E — Count Median ??

In the fourth question, I simply used the Sieve of Eratosthenes to get the prime numbers less than 1e6, after that I iterate from 2 to the largest prime less than 1e6, and simply code out for the number of ways the number can be broken down! Just be careful when we multiply two numbers of digits 5 and 6! Link to my code- https://atcoder.jp/contests/abc169/submissions/13855795

what is my mistake in my code???

## include

using namespace std;

int multiply(int array[], int N) { int pro = 1; for (int i = 0; i < N; i++) t = t * array[i]; return t; } int main() { int N; cin>>N; int array[N]; for(int i=0; i<N; i++) { cin>>array[i]; } multiply(array,N); if(array == 0) { cout<<0<<endl; } else if( (multiply(array,N)) > (1000*1000*1000*1000*1000*1000)) {

}

what is my mistake in my code for B???

## include

using namespace std;

int multiply(int array[], int N) { int pro = 1; for (int i = 0; i < N; i++) t = t * array[i]; return t; } int main() { int N; cin>>N; int array[N]; for(int i=0; i<N; i++) { cin>>array[i]; } multiply(array,N); if(array == 0) { cout<<0<<endl; } else if( (multiply(array,N)) > (1000*1000*1000*1000*1000*1000)) {

}

problem C solution : https://atcoder.jp/contests/abc169/submissions/13874016

Why this fails for problem B: https://atcoder.jp/contests/abc169/submissions/13804989

store 1e18 in a variable and then do the rest. I think that will do the job!!

How to solve c? I multiplied a*b and took floor(a*b). What's wrong? submission

See, Double can store large values but on the cost of significant digits,in Long you will get more significant digits before decimal point but then you can not store digits after the decimal points

But I also tried (long)(b*100)*a/100. What's wrong with this?

problem B solution : https://atcoder.jp/contests/abc169/submissions/13824612

Please someone help me out with Problem C ....... My Submission

Precision issue. Do long long x = round(b*100) and AC

i thought C would give precision error if i use

`long double`

. i tried almost 6/7 types of approach(wrong) without using floating point. about 3 minutes before the contest would end, i simply tried using`long double`

and output it with type casting to`long long`

and it worked! wow -_-Whats wrong wit C

import java.math.BigDecimal; import java.util.Scanner;

public class Main {

My Simple and short Solution for C (Used Bigdecimal Library in JAVA)

You can do it this way but still whats wrong in my code.

Test it out where the floating point value is stuff like 1.12, 1.13, etc (if Java handles floating point the same as python those two cases should show you the issue). Floating point error in this line is your issue:

long b=(long)(sc.nextDouble()*100);

I usually get one hit on both Codeforces and Atcoder, but this time seems horrible xD

Dude you are really patient!

Whats wrong in D

import java.util.Scanner;

public class Main {

}

What is the problem with this solution of C?Can someone help?

## include<bits/stdc++.h>

using namespace std; typedef long long ll;

## define mod 1000000007

int main() { ll a; float b1; cin>>a>>b1;

b1=b1*100; ll b=b1; ll s=a*b; s=s/100; printf("%lld\n",s); }

Maybe precision issues? Try doing b1 = round(b1*100)

Well, if the input is 1.890000 then it becomes 189.000000 and then 189 by typecast. There shouldn't be any problem.

You dont understand how it works. The number may be interpreted as 188.99999999... which is the same as 189.00000 but when you cast to int in c++ the value is truncated, it sort of an undefined behaviour, the value may be casted to 188 or 189, use the round to avoid that.

Yeah, I got it. That was the problem actually. Thanks a lot.

awesome one ! me i just define b as long double and took long long c=a*b and then i cout c and it works also as simple as that

Can anybody help me why this submission for D fails at 18th testcase? submission

can some one explain to me why my 1st test case not working of B question

(https://atcoder.jp/contests/abc169/submissions/13891717)

I have a similar problem too: https://atcoder.jp/contests/abc169/submissions/13892048

What is more, the first test case (hand_01.txt) on AtCoder's Dropbox looks like this:

Input:`2 4294967296 4294967296`

Output:`-1`

I compiled my program locally using different compilers and there was nothing wrong with my code ://

https://atcoder.jp/contests/abc169/submissions/13892267 WA?WHy?

https://atcoder.jp/contests/abc169/submissions/13900202 [WA] https://atcoder.jp/contests/abc169/submissions/13900438 [AC]

Both are identical solutions for problem B of AtCoder Beginner Contest 169. Does anyone knows why this happen?

Maybe, someone playing with the testcases :)

Or maybe first solution is sent to Problem A not Problem B?

Yes, thanks Mucosolvan

I think I got a beautiful solution for F: the answer is just the coefficient of x^s in polynominal (2 + x^a1)(2 + x^a2)...(2 + x^an) here '^' is for power. we can just ignore higher order coefficient than x^s.

https://atcoder.jp/contests/abc169/submissions/13847100

please ignore unremoved code for problem D, E.

In B:For the statement:

`if(inp[i] <= 1e18/ans)`

I got WA. But when i wrote :`if(inp[i] <= 1000000000000000000/ans)`

I got AC. Is there any differences between 1e18 and 1000000000000000000?? Otherwise what is the reason??You should cast 1e18 to long long otherwise the result of the division becomes a float.

Thanks man. That means 1e18 format is double type.

Yup!

In editorial there is a typo in problem D English version.

Wrong:$$$O(N)$$$

Correct:$$$O(sqrt(N))$$$

Can AnyBody please tell how can i reduce the submission time of my solution to the problem F?

https://atcoder.jp/contests/abc169/submissions/13920879

I have seen people getting AC in less than 100ms while mine is giving AC in 1000 ms.

thanks in advance. :).

In the editorial of problem F it says:

`dp[i][j] = When the choices for the first i options is already determined, the number of combination such that the sum of ak for each k that the first option was chosen is equal to j`

What does it even mean?

I think it just means, dp[i][j] refers to how many ways we can reach sum equal to j using i elements

Can anyone help me debug my solution? I get TLE on 6-7 test cases, no idea why. Thank you!

i * ican overflow since n goes upto $$$10^{12}$$$Use long long instead.

T_T I don't know how I missed that. Thanks!

what is my wrong with my code in problem-c? https://atcoder.jp/contests/abc169/submissions/13926562

For problem D, Maybe this sounds stupid, But can someone please explain why is it optimal to compute for each prime and its powers first, then similarly with next prime and its powers, and so on instead of going from 2 onwards ?

same thing I was also wondering .

Can anyone provide any proof for problem-E for both odd and even case.

If we increase one value by $$$1$$$ and leave the rest as it is, then median can stay the same or increase by $$$1$$$ for odd $$$n$$$ and stay the same or increase by \frac{1}{2}

Unable to parse markup [type=CF_MATHJAX]

is even. Now let's set $$$X_i = A_i$$$ and increase all of them one by one till we reach $$$X_i = B_i$$$. At first median equals median of $$$A_i$$$, and after all operations equals median of $$$B_i$$$ and at each step it will either stay the same or increase by $$$1$$$ in case of odd $$$n$$$ and by $$$\frac 12$$$ for even $$$n$$$ thus will reach all integers for odd $$$n$$$ and halfintegers for even $$$n$$$ from range $$$[\text{median}(A_1, \ldots, A_n), \text{median}(B_1, \ldots, B_n)]$$$.To prove we can't reach any other value we only need to see, that median of an integer sequence is an integer for odd $$$n$$$ and a half integer for even $$$n$$$ and see that we can't reach a value outside that segment, but this is straightforward conclusion from the fact, that if all values increase or stay the same, then the median can only increase or stay the same as well.

For problem F, it says f(T) is the number of different non-empty subsets satisfying the given condition. Now consider the first sample. It was given that f(T) is 2 ({1,2}, {3}). By the definition, shouldn't f(T) be 3 ({1,2}, {3}, {1,3}) ? Unless there is a translation issue.

If anyone is still stuck at D here is a Solution

I am Facing problems in the C . No matter what I submit , I am shown wrong answer in 6/22 cases . I am not understanding where is the error or fault exists in that code .. If anyone knows , please give me the solution . My code is given below ::::

## include<stdio.h>

int main() { long long int a,pro1; double b,pro=1.0; scanf("%lld %lf",&a,&b); b=b*100; pro=(a*b); pro1=(long long int)(pro/100); printf("%lld",pro1); return 0; }

For big values of $$$a$$$ the variable $$$pro$$$ has simply not enough bits to store the exact result of $$$a*b$$$. In this case the double type truncates bits, which results in pro1 beeing some other value than the mathematecally expected one.

Can someone help me where I'm going wrong in problem D, I'm getting hand_22 as the only test case as WA. Here is my code https://atcoder.jp/contests/abc169/submissions/14102528 Thanks

`ull i=1;`

You have this just before the for loop, but it should be inside it, so that the while loop always starts at 1. Since all the primefactors in mp are independent of each other.Thanks a lot for reading my code and identifying my mistake.

Can anyone tell me why I am getting runtime error in this solution https://atcoder.jp/contests/abc169/submissions/14630442

//**B**

## include<bits/stdc++.h>

using namespace std; typedef long long int ll; typedef long double ld; int main() { int t; cin>>t; if(t==0)return cout<<0,0; long double s = 1; vector vec(t); for(int i=0; i<t; cin>>vec[i++]); sort(vec.begin(),vec.end()); for(auto &it: vec){ if(it==0)return cout<<0,0; if(s>1e18/it)return cout<<-1,0; s *= it; } cout<<(ll)(s)<<'\n'; }